Comments 1 to 4:

1. Alpinist at 23:57 PM on 20 December, 2016

   I'm confused. I thought we were going to be draining swamps, instead we're creating new, and more contaminated swamps? Time for the GOP in the US to repeal the laws of physics. Buckle up.

   2 0
2. Daniel Mocsny at 07:13 AM on 21 December, 2016

   See also: The Seas Are Rising Around Donald Trump - "He may deny global warming, but it's still threatening to swamp his properties."

   The article seems a bit optimistic about Trump's life expectancy, though. It says:

   "Despite Trump's pronouncements, there is strong evidence that he—personally—could pay the price for climate change in his property interests along the South Florida oceanfront and Intracoastal Waterway."

   and then goes on to project the impact of sea level rise on some of Trump's signature properties by mid-century, when the 1946-born Trump would be over 100 years old. (Just 0.02 percent of the population, or 55,000 people, are 100 years old or older in the USA now. Only 71 people were documented to be older than 110 years on the entire planet in 2014.) Perhaps that is why Ivanka Trump claims to take the problem more seriously - she is much more likely to be alive to deal with the mess her father's science denial can only worsen.

   0 0
3. psloss at 12:09 PM on 21 December, 2016

   Looks like Miami will become the Venice of the Americas.

   0 0
4. william at 03:24 AM on 27 December, 2016

   More digging into why the insurance companies would insure such properties is needed.  If they alone were carrying the risk, I bet they would completely stop issuing new policies and not renew old policies.  Obviously they think this is a good investment.  How does it work and who is really carrying the can.

   0 0

You need to be logged in to post a comment. Login via the left margin or if you're new, register here.