Arguments
Recent Comments
Prev 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 Next
Comments 30101 to 30150:
-
saileshrao at 22:24 PM on 31 March 2015Global warming and drought are turning the Golden State brown
"The good news, however, is that this is only one possible future. If society works to limit global warming to under 2 °C, which is still possible (1), then we can likely avoid committing to a brown California."
If California is experiencing such a drought with global warming at a mere 0.8 °C, how is this "good news" assertion justified? -
CBDunkerson at 21:33 PM on 31 March 2015Ipso proves impotent at curbing the Mail's climate misinformation
ryland, so how exactly would you suggest they go about showing a photograph of the actual emission of CO2 from power plants? Given that CO2 isn't visible?
Sorry, but I'm just not buying it. There is nothing 'false' about showing power plants as a source of the CO2 which causes global warming.
Which illustrates to a degree the problem that IPSO and other 'press scrutiny' organizations face... people live in very different realities and what is 'truth' for one person is very often 'fiction' for another. That said, there are objective truths that these organizations could and should enforce. Whether or not some people might mistake visible steam for invisible CO2 and thereby be 'deceived' into a 'reinforced message' that power plants cause global warming (which... they do) is exceedingly subjective. The fact that arctic sea ice is on a declining trend is not.
-
uncletimrob at 18:55 PM on 31 March 2015Global warming and drought are turning the Golden State brown
I like the cold/hot/dry/wet graph! A nice representation that says much. Thanks.
-
ryland at 14:50 PM on 31 March 2015Ipso proves impotent at curbing the Mail's climate misinformation
CB Dunkerson My point about the steam from cooling towers is that these pictures are juxtaposed to stories about global warming due to human emission of CO2 from burning fossil fuels. The picture gives the impression that this is an example of the pollution due to this burning when in fac t it is nothing of the kind. The picture is falsely used to reinforce the message of the written piece.
-
DSL at 14:28 PM on 31 March 2015Scientists link Arctic warming to intense summer heatwaves in the northern hemisphere
Also, Watchdog, where is your data source for the following claim: "The Growing Antarctic Ice Phase during the Southern Hemisphere's Semi-Annual Climate Cooling ICE Growth Phase outstrips the much smaller in Volume simultaneous occurring of Arctic Sea Ice Shrinkage."
One thing you need to consider when comparing volume: Arctic sea ice thickness has been much greater than Antarctic sea ice thickness. Meters-thick multi-year ice once dominated the Arctic. Most of that has been lost over the last 35 years. Antarctic sea ice, in contrast, has mostly melted out each SH summer. This has led Kurtz & Markus 2012 to conclude that "These results [of little change in Antarctic sea ice volume] are in stark contrast to the much greater observed losses in Arctic sea ice volume and illustrate the different hemispheric changes of the polar sea ice covers in recent years."
Massonnet et al. 2013, using a model-assisted reconstruction, find that "the global Antarctic sea ice volume has risen at a pace of 355 +/-338 km3/decade (5.6 +/- 5.3%/decade) during [1980-2008]." You can see from PIOMAS that Arctic volume loss over the same period dwarfs that estimate (to the tune of 3000 km3/decade +/- 1000 km3).
Holland et al. 2014 agrees with Massonnet, concluding this: "This ice volume increase is an order of magnitude smaller than the Arctic decrease, and about half the size of the increased freshwater supply from the Antarctic Ice Sheet."
Perhaps you have other sources. I will continue to look for evidence that supports your position in the literature, but I am not hopeful. -
Stephen Baines at 14:07 PM on 31 March 2015Scientists link Arctic warming to intense summer heatwaves in the northern hemisphere
Watchdog
That NASA text looks to be old as it refers to laser altimetry satellite data in the future tense, even though ICEsat went up in 2003. At that time it's safe to say the issue was up for debate. Now less so.
Second, the reference you claim estimates ice mass loss (Memin etal 2014. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 404: 344–353.) says this in it's conclusions.
"Comparing our mass-balance budget with that from King et al. (2012) for AIS regions not covered by Envisat, we obtained that the AIS lost
−47 ± 35 Gt/yr in good agreement with recent published results
and validating our methodology."You might be confused by the sign on the mass loss (loss of a negative number is a positive?), but a quick look at their table 1 shows that they are in rough agreement with all the other studies that have used gravimetric and altimeter information to show there has been mass loss from Antarctica.
-
DSL at 14:05 PM on 31 March 2015Scientists link Arctic warming to intense summer heatwaves in the northern hemisphere
Watchdog, I'm not seeing where in Memin et al. 2014 you found that the overall ice mass in Antarctica was growing. Table 1 strongly suggests that a positive overall trend is unlikely at best, and the authors never actually state their assessment of overall mass balance or contradict the overall mass balance assessments of others.
Also, your first link--to NASA--is weak. It was written sixteen years ago. -
Rob Honeycutt at 13:52 PM on 31 March 2015Scientists link Arctic warming to intense summer heatwaves in the northern hemisphere
Watchdog... Regarding your first link, you sorta kinda need to read the whole thing to get the gist of what they're discussing. Later in that passage on the Earth Observatory they state:
In addition to increasing the amount of melting, global warming would also be expected to increase the amount of precipitation in the polar regions. There are three reasons for this: 1) warmer air can carry more moisture than colder air; 2) warmer wates would encourage increased evaporation from the ocean; and 3) lessened sea ice would also lead to more evaporation from the ocean, as more ocean area would be exposed directly to the atmosphere. Global warming could therefore be expected initially to increase both melting and snowfall. Depending on which increase dominates, the early result could be either an overall decay or an overall growth of the ice sheets.
-
PhilippeChantreau at 13:16 PM on 31 March 2015Scientists link Arctic warming to intense summer heatwaves in the northern hemisphere
Watchdog, that is a rather surprising response. Not only the period to determine what is climate shows up all over the IPCC as 30 years, but there is also a limit as to how much data you need to establish a trend, or lack thereof. Since you ask, I'll redicrect the question to you. What time series are you considering to make your assertion? How many years of data are necessary to establish a statistically significant trend for said timeseries?
-
Watchdog at 10:27 AM on 31 March 2015Scientists link Arctic warming to intense summer heatwaves in the northern hemisphere
Stephen Baines,
NASA concluded that it is uncertain whether or not Antarctic & Greenland's Land Ice is increasing or decreasing; and I quote:
"It is uncertain, however, whether the world's two major ice sheets-Greenland and Antarctica-have been growing or diminishing."
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/PolarIce/polar_ice2.php
AND and, a paper in Earth & Planetary Science Letters is more specific: Antarctica's Land Ice Mass is Growing!
The data examined shows most areas of the ice sheet are stable to increasing in ice mass, including the East Antarctic ice sheet, which alone contains over 80% of the total ice mass of Antarctica.
Snow- and ice-height change in Antarctica from satellite gravimetry and altimetry data -- published Oct 15, 2014
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012821X14005068+
My point continues to be:One should include both Northern & Southern Hemispheric ICE ice Data (aka Global ICE Volumes at any given Time), IF/WHEN if/when one is presenting -> ICE ice Affects upon the Globe.
+
Moderator Response:[JH] You are now skating on the thin ice of excessive repition which is prohibited by the SkS Comments Policy. In addition, the use of "all caps" is akin to shouting and is also prohibited by the Comments Policy.
Please note that posting comments here at SkS is a privilege, not a right. This privilege can be rescinded if the posting individual treats adherence to the Comments Policy as optional, rather than the mandatory condition of participating in this online forum.
Please take the time to review the policy and ensure future comments are in full compliance with it. Thanks for your understanding and compliance in this matter.
-
Stephen Baines at 08:35 AM on 31 March 2015Scientists link Arctic warming to intense summer heatwaves in the northern hemisphere
Here is another paper indicating effects of glacial melting on sea ice production.
-
Stephen Baines at 08:22 AM on 31 March 2015Scientists link Arctic warming to intense summer heatwaves in the northern hemisphere
Watchdog,
Tristan is referring to land ice on Antarctica, which is losing mass just as it is in Greenland. Loss of land ice definitely suggests there is melting due to a warming of the climate in both hemispheres.
The extent of sea ice in Antarctica is not only influenced by temperature, which has actually been increasing for both surface ocean and air in the Southern Ocean. Winds that blow ice out to sea in winter, and decreasing salinity, which is negatively affected by ice cap melt, both increase winter maxima in sea ice extent of Antarctica.
-
chrismc at 06:31 AM on 31 March 2015Ipso proves impotent at curbing the Mail's climate misinformation
Now that the General Election is officially underway in the UK, expect more of this sort of thing. But it may not always involve the national press, and because election adverts are not subject to the rules of the Advertising Standards Authority, it seems little could be done to redress the following piece of nonsense and others like it, which may yet appear. I doubt IPSO would be able to do any good, though I have not investigated their rules wrt election material.
Taken from The Comet, Hitchin edition, Thursday March 26th 2015. (No link provided as subscription may be needed):
"Let's talk about climate change...
John and UKIP (United Kingdom Independence Party) do not believe in all these doom and gloom stories..."
"I am a skeptic on climate change and believe that any effects have been over exaggerated. The first half of 2014 was the coldest since records began in 1888. The Earth has warmed about 16 degrees F in the three million years following the last ice age and since 1979 the increase has been 0.19 degrees F well within the range of natural fluctuation."
John Stocker MBE UKIP Hitchin and Harpenden.
And that is it. No references of course. I will have a large poster ready in case they knock on my door, just to put them straight. Politely, of course.
-
Watchdog at 05:49 AM on 31 March 2015Scientists link Arctic warming to intense summer heatwaves in the northern hemisphere
Tristan@16..
I didn't say - the Southern Hemisphere is Cooling OR Warming..Additionally, my point has naught to do with whether or not Antarctica's been exhibiting a Warming Climate vatiable during the past 30 years or not.
My point pertains to the fact that one should include both the Northern and Southern Hemispheric ICE Data (aka Global ICE Volumes at a given Time) IF/WHEN one is presenting -> ICE Affects upon the Globe.
As any graph of annual (or more) Arctic and Antarctic Sea Ice Extents reveal, Both hemispheres are Simultaneous experiencing Semi-Annual Cooling & Warming Phases at opposing times of the Annum.
Both hemipheres are simultaneously out of phase with one another
One Hemisphere's "Winter" occurs _during_ the other's "Summer"
At any given time, as e.g., the Southern Hemisphere Cools the Antarctic ICE Grows AND the Northern Hemisphere Warms thus the Arctic Sea Ice Shrinks..again, at any given time during any year.
The Growing Antarctic Ice Phase during the Southern Hemisphere's Semi-Annual Climate Cooling ICE Growth Phase outstrips the much smaller in Volume simultaneous occurring of Arctic Sea Ice Shrinkage.
My focus is upon the level of the _Net Cancelling Effect_ of Global Temps occurring opposionally and simultaneiously in Both Hemispheres) during any Annum.
As the shrinkage extent of Arctic's Sea Ice is indicative of the Northern Hemisphere's Warming "Summertime", the simultaneous addition of Antarctica's Ice due to the contemporaneous Cooling Winter - must be factored in - IF one is discussing impact of Global Temps upon EARTH's TOTAL ICE - and vice versa.
LASTLY, whereas you've said, "Antarctica is losing ICE Mass", NASA says that on Sept 19, 2014 (Antarctica's Winter), Antarctica reached a "New Record Maximum" level of ICE.
NASA: Antarctic Sea Ice Reaches New Record Maximum
On Sept. 19, 2014, the five-day average of Antarctic sea ice extent exceeded 20 million square kilometers for the first time since 1979, according to the National Snow and Ice Data Center. The red line shows the average maximum extent from 1979-2014. Image: NASA's Scientific Visualization Studio
http://www.nasa.gov/content/goddard/antarctic-sea-ice-reaches-new-record-maximum/ -
jja at 03:41 AM on 31 March 2015Global warming and drought are turning the Golden State brown
One aspect that has not been looked at and should is the contribution of SE Asian aerosol loading as a contribution to the 'RRR'. This was implicated in the GEOmip analyses. For example: Moore et. al. (2013) http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2013JD021060
The negative PNA-like pattern in G1-piControl is associated with a westward shift of the jet stream toward East Asia, blocking activity over the high latitudes of the North Pacific Ocean, and a strong split-flow configuration over the central North Pacific Ocean. Figure 7 displays these features with a decreased jet speed over central, west Pacific region (with across-model differences, Figure S7), and the 200 hPa geopotential height map also shows a “blocking” high pressure over the northern North Pacific under G1.
-
michael sweet at 01:51 AM on 31 March 2015New measurements confirm extra heating from our carbon dioxide
Citizenschallenge,
As I understand it Jim Steele has it almost backwards. AGW causes dry places to get dryer. Heat waves are worse when there is little surface water to evaporate and cool the atmosphere. In places like California, they have had little rain. When they have a heat wave, it is much hotter than it would have been because there is no water to evaporate to cool the weather off.
AGW's twin effects of altering rainfall and making it hotter causes heat waves to be even more distructive. California has had its fourth dry rainy season. It has been record hot there for months. Expect this summer to be even hotter and have a worse fire season (another of the effects of AGW). They pray El Nino will bail them out but no luck so far on that.
-
2015 SkS Weekly Digest #13
Or, it could just be a cartoon using artistic license :)
-
Tristan at 01:13 AM on 31 March 2015Scientists link Arctic warming to intense summer heatwaves in the northern hemisphere
Watchdog@13
A) From the glossary: The classical period for averaging climate variables is 30 years, as defined by the World Meteorological Organization.B) Antarctica is cooling in some areas and warming rapidly in others. It's inaccurate to say the southern hemisphere is cooling. As I said, Antarctica is losing ice mass.
-
Manwichstick at 01:01 AM on 31 March 2015New measurements confirm extra heating from our carbon dioxide
RE: citizenschallenge #22
Please correct me if I'm wrong: It is my understanding that heat waves (high pressure domes) are a consequence of wind patterns (or lack there of), primarily. So both the start of a heat wave, and its ultimate conclusion, are at the hands of a much larger-scale planetary wind/ocean currents.The idea that "local" humidity effects the duration/severity of heat waves seems a bit like a "forest for the trees" type of error - to me. It makes sense that local humidity is important - but not really THAT important.
If any one can clarify...
-
DSL at 00:02 AM on 31 March 20152015 SkS Weekly News Roundup #13A
Kaz, at the risk of "dogpiling," I'll provide another piece.
Climate is in a constant state of change and has been over the course of Earth's history. Yet for most of that history, climate has changed slowly--slowly enough that species have been able to migrate/adapt, for the most part. It's only when climate changes rapidly or to an extreme condition (deep cold or deep warmth) that many species have problems.
The current warming is extremely rapid. The Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum, about 55 million years ago, was one of the most rapid sustained warmings in Earth's history. Right now, we're doing about 10x to 40x the rate of PETM warming, depending on the method one chooses to compare.
This might be no big deal if we knew that the warming was going to reverse course soon. However, there is no physical reason why that would happen, and every physical reason why it should continue for several centuries--or longer if we continue to dig up fossil carbon and dump it into the atmosphere.
CO2 is essential to keeping the planet warm enough for a robust array of life. It always has been. Yet that same process--the "greenhouse effect"--can be enhanced, and that's what we're doing. Nature hasn't increased atmospheric CO2 this rapidly in at least 300 million years. We are doing it by taking fossil carbon that was stored over tens of millions of years and dumping it into the atmosphere in a matter of a few centuries. -
One Planet Only Forever at 23:48 PM on 30 March 20152015 SkS Weekly Digest #13
The ice could also be air free with enough of the top cube out of the water that it is holding down the rest of the cubes. This can occur in a tumbler where the cubes are kept from shifting sideways to rise to the surface.
However, given the number of cubes shown below the surface in the image almost the entire top cube would have to be out of the water, unless the water was very warm.
-
Composer99 at 23:41 PM on 30 March 2015New measurements confirm extra heating from our carbon dioxide
citizenschallenge:
I don't have a cite, but to the best of my knowledge:
(1) A heat wave does not require the absence of atmospheric water vapour, or indeed of water stored in soil, etc.. IMO your interlocutor needs to provide a cite to support the claim "heat waves usually occur under very dry conditions". (Obviously not a veteran of Ottawa, Ontario heat waves, then.)
(2) Atmospheric water vapour is geographically and temporally highly variable (e.g. there is less of it in, say, desert regions, or in polar regions during the winter, than, say the wet tropics).
I can't say I know much about heat wave formation, but I'm rather doubting the person you are quoting does, either.
-
juggared at 23:25 PM on 30 March 2015CO2 only causes 35% of global warming
There were many ways temperature or other climate features could influence the carbon dioxide level one way or another. Perhaps variations of temperature and of weather patterns caused land vegetation to release extra CO2, or take it up... perhaps the oceans were involved through massive changes in their circulation or ice cover... or through changes in their CO2-absorbing plankton, which would bloom or decline insofar as they were fertilized by minerals, which reached them from dusty winds, rivers, and ocean upwelling, all of which could change with the climate... or perhaps there were still more complicated and obscure effects. Into the 21st century, scientists kept finding new ways that warming would push more of the gas into the atmosphere. As one of them remarked, "it is difficult to explain the demise of the ice sheets without the added heating from CO2 ... this gas has killed ice sheets in the past and may do so again.
-
Watchdog at 23:09 PM on 30 March 2015Scientists link Arctic warming to intense summer heatwaves in the northern hemisphere
Philippe@10
Yes, that 10yr graph only establishes a "stability" over 10 yrs as it indicates that 2014 was not a particularly 'Warm' year in that time.
In your opinion, what time period is long enough to establish whether or not tGlobal Climate is undergoing a Cooling vs Warming Phase? 10yrs? 150yrs? 2000yrs? 20,000yrs? 400,000yrs?
Tristan@11 - At the same time As the Northern Hemisphere Warms,
the So. Hemisphere - including the Far Larger ICY Antarctica - Cools..
Total Global Heat content is a continuous Global Measurement. -
CBDunkerson at 22:56 PM on 30 March 2015Scientists link Arctic warming to intense summer heatwaves in the northern hemisphere
Watchdog, you look at an ice area graph showing 2012 minimum extent (not area) nearly half the size of 2005 minimum extent and conclude that this indicates it has been "relatively stable"?
We have very different definitions of 'stable'.
-
CBDunkerson at 22:49 PM on 30 March 2015Ipso proves impotent at curbing the Mail's climate misinformation
ryland, why would IPSO do anything about the 'failure' to point out an irrelevancy?
'That is steam, not smoke!'
Um, ok... so what? How is that relevant to global warming? People might over-estimate the amount of smoke emitted by power plants (since steam output is greater)? And that would oversell global warming how exactly? Smoke is particulate matter... which causes cooling.
-
Watchdog at 22:46 PM on 30 March 2015Scientists link Arctic warming to intense summer heatwaves in the northern hemisphere
Philippe@10
Yes, that 10yr graph only establishes a "stability" over 10 yrs as it indicates that 2014 was not a particularly 'Warm' year in that time.
In your opinion, what time period is long enough to establish whether or not tGlobal Climate is undergoing a Cooling vs Warming Phase? 10yrs? 150yrs? 2000yrs? 20,000yrs? 400,000yrs?
Tristan@11 - At the same time As the Northern Hemisphere Warms,
the So. Hemisphere - including the Far Larger ICY Antarctica - Cools..
Total Global Heat content is a continuous Global Measurement. -
Daniel Bailey at 21:43 PM on 30 March 20152015 SkS Weekly News Roundup #13A
Saying that since climate change existed before mankind is proof that this iteration of change is not caused by man is like saying that the darkness of night disproves the existence of the sun.
It's not true and it just makes you sound uninformed.
If you wish to pursue your position further, read this post and the comments underneath it and then (and only then) place any remaining concerns on the the comment thread there:
-
Glenn Tamblyn at 20:50 PM on 30 March 20152015 SkS Weekly News Roundup #13A
Kaz
For most of the Earth's history the only life on Earth was bacteria. Anything we might recognise as plants or animals only appeared in the last 500-600 million years. Whereas bacteria (and their even older cousins, Archaea) go back at least 3 billion years and maybe as far back as 3.8 billion years. We complex organisms - people, poplars, prawns etc are recent interlopers.
And those ancient bacteria transformed the planet and the atmosphere more than 2 billion years before anything 'complex' appeared.Google 'The Great Oxygenation Event' as an example.
-
Stephan at 18:22 PM on 30 March 2015Climate's changed before
Re. [3], [5]: Hoyt's argument is flawed on a very basic level. It goes like this: "Water vapour has a atmospheric life time of about a week. So if there is more water vapor in the atmosphere, we must somehow lift that water from the ground up into the atmosphere every week. That requires energy, which must come from somewhere. There is not enough energy to do that. So water vapor cannot increase as much as claimed". What he ignores is the very simple fact that that energy required to lift the water is not lost to the system. Whenever water vapor leaves the atmosphere (via precipitation), those raindrops and snow flakes and hailstones fall back to the ground, and their potential energy is converted back to kinetic energy, and ultimately heat.
-
Opinionated Kaz at 18:11 PM on 30 March 20152015 SkS Weekly News Roundup #13A
I am no scientist but how was there life before plants and trees and still oxygen breathing crwatures?
Yes I know as a species we are harming the planet but it seems like in other ways not through climate change. The Earth has gone through cooling and warming more times than Kim Kardashian has waved her backside about. From all the resourced researched I have looked at Climate changes are a natural process and the only 'green' is money.
-
Tristan at 16:00 PM on 30 March 2015Scientists link Arctic warming to intense summer heatwaves in the northern hemisphere
Whoops, meant earth system, not biosphere.
-
Tristan at 15:59 PM on 30 March 2015Scientists link Arctic warming to intense summer heatwaves in the northern hemisphere
Watchdog@9
"does the Arctic Sea Ice Itself in-turn Affect the Global Climate more than Global Climate affects the Arctic Sea Ice?"
The extent of sea ice in the arctic summer is one of the amplifying feedbacks in the climate system. When the planet heats, summer sea ice goes down, which reduces the earth's albedo, which causes the planet to heat more.
Changes in Antarctic Ice volume are also indicative of the biosphere's total heat content.
-
bozzza at 15:45 PM on 30 March 2015Ipso proves impotent at curbing the Mail's climate misinformation
It's not immoral to have a differnet opinion but it is immoral to lie.
-
ryland at 14:57 PM on 30 March 2015Ipso proves impotent at curbing the Mail's climate misinformation
But on the other hand Ipso doesn't do much about pictures showing steam not smoke coming out of power plant stacks in newspaper articles about global warming. Perhaps the body just isn't up to its monitoring role. And labelling as immoral those who have a different opinion, not only smacks a little of use of the term heretic in the middle ages but also is unlikely to get them to change that opinion.
-
PhilippeChantreau at 14:34 PM on 30 March 2015Scientists link Arctic warming to intense summer heatwaves in the northern hemisphere
Arctic climate stable over the past 9 years? Really? That time period is long enough to establish stability of climate? News to me.
-
Bernard J. at 14:19 PM on 30 March 20152015 SkS Weekly Digest #13
...or D218O...
Or frozen to the bottom of the glass! -
Watchdog at 14:02 PM on 30 March 2015Scientists link Arctic warming to intense summer heatwaves in the northern hemisphere
Moderator - The points of my post(s) are two-fold.
A) Arctic Climate is relatively stable from 2005 to today.. In fact,
2014's Summer ICE graphs as the coolest summer over that time
B) Considering Arctic Sea Ice Volume is only in the vicinity of being less than, for example, 1/10th of 1 percent of Antarctica's Total Ice Volume, it's small variations over the past 10 years reflects the Arctic's regional climate fluctuation.
Said another way, the Climate factors Underlying/Affecting the Extent of Arctic Sea Ice - have not significantly Changed during the Time presented by the Graph I'd posted - and Changes in Antarctic Ice Volume could easily be wondered as being much more indicative of Global Climate - due to its vast disparity in size when compared with Arctic Sea Ice.
Additionally, considering Arctic Sea Ice as being the Effect of the Underlying Cause of Regional Climate, in anyone's opinion here, does the Arctic Sea Ice Itself in-turn Affect the Global Climate more than Global Climate affects the Arctic Sea Ice? -
Magma at 12:40 PM on 30 March 20152015 SkS Weekly Digest #13
I'm not entirely convinced about the ice in the glass on the left... unless it's D2O or H218O.
-
Bernard J. at 10:52 AM on 30 March 20152015 SkS Weekly Digest #12
One cannot have a cartoon like the one above and not refer to the excellent mocking of denialism that is the Hy Brazil scene from Erick the Viking.
-
John Mason at 07:12 AM on 30 March 2015The UK winter of 2014-15: another Tabloid FAIL
The last day of the Six Nations was a rollercoaster, Bill!
Rao - no further comment required. Phil Eden by contrast is one of the good guys. As with Roger Brugge, I have always respected him. These guys stand 100 miles above the likes of Corbyn and Madden.
-
william at 04:57 AM on 30 March 20152015 SkS Weekly News Roundup #11A
Climate change is not a technical problem.. We all know what needs to be done. It is a political problem... PPCT.... who Pays the Piper Calls the Tune. As long as rich vested interests are allowed to buy our politicians, they will tell them what to do.
http://mtkass.blogspot.co.nz/2015/01/ppct.html
Moderator Response:[JH] Please do not use the SkS comment threads to promote your own blog post. Doing so is akin to advertising.
-
billthefrog at 03:47 AM on 30 March 2015The UK winter of 2014-15: another Tabloid FAIL
Nice one John,
Coming so soon after Super Saturday's nail biting end to 6N15, I was surprised to see that you had managed to put together such a "rogues gallery". I thought you might still have been too wound up. (As we had already clinched the wooden spoon by then, I could just settle down in front of the goggle-box for 7 hours, with a big "Do not disturb, except with cups of tea and slices of cake" sign on the door.)
I don't know which of those clowns is worst, but Rao is simply just repetitive. If one were to redact the dates, many of his articles from one year to the next would be fully interchangeable.
He may, or may not, still work there, but the Torygraph did used to have a reasonable person doing some of their weather material - namely Philip Eden. I've had a couple of his books out the local library, and one of these - A Change in the Weather - devotes a chapter or two to nonsensical weather headlines. It's worth a quicko dekko, if you haven't seen it already.
cheers bill f
-
bozzza at 03:45 AM on 30 March 2015Glaciers are growing
The mass loss from 1996 to 2005 is more than double the mass loss rate in the previous decade of 1986 to 1995 and over four times the mass loss rate over 1976 to 1985.
A regular doubling period is the exact definition for exponentiality... can anyone please tell me when the saviour of sinusoidality kicks in??
-
z1robbie at 03:28 AM on 30 March 2015Water vapor is the most powerful greenhouse gas
I am working to understand the complex interactions involved in the most complicated thing there is, climate. Water vapor and clouds seem to be where the most uncertainty lies, according to my understanding of IPCC reports.
Have there been any research papers done on the diurnal temperature changes in desert areas ?
It would seem to me in the near absence of water vapor (low humidity) the difference between day time highs and night time lows over time should correspond to the increase in co2 during the same time period. That is since the Industrial revolution the difference between highs and lows should be decreasing proportional to the increase in co2. They would be inversely proportional.
-
Watchdog at 03:07 AM on 30 March 2015Scientists link Arctic warming to intense summer heatwaves in the northern hemisphere
CORRECTION to my above post.
It should read Arctic Sea Ice AREA (in km2) and not VOLUME.
Arctic Sea Ice annual area average is c. 7.5 Million Square Km..
Arctic Sea Ice annual thickness average c. 2.5 Meters. (0.0025 km3)
Arctic Sea Ice Volume averages rounded up -> 20,000 km3
In Contrast Total Antarctic ICE is c. 26,500,000 km3,
which is larger than Arctic Sea Ice by a factor of >1000Moderator Response:[JH] What is your point?
-
bozzza at 02:31 AM on 30 March 2015Glaciers are growing
Ok, so what if I were to say the rapid decline(rate of change) after 1990 was also seen at the start of the graph in figure1(Basic). Does the graph in figure1 actually make any statment keeping this in mind?
-
Watchdog at 02:08 AM on 30 March 2015Scientists link Arctic warming to intense summer heatwaves in the northern hemisphere
Denmark's Meteorological Institute publishes Arctic Sea Ice Volume from data taken daily by the Greenland Climate Research Centre.
Arctic Sea Ice Volume - Declines in Summer and Rises in Winter.
Graph of the past 10 years includes data from Today (29Mar15)
Sea ice extent in recent years (in million km2) for the northern hemisphere, as a function of date.
http://ocean.dmi.dk/arctic/old_icecover.uk.php
The Danish Meteorological Institute (DMI) was established in 1872. In 2013 DMI employs 350 people. DMI is an institution under the Danish Ministry of Climate, Energy and BuildingModerator Response:[JH] What is the point of your post?
-
One Planet Only Forever at 01:47 AM on 30 March 2015The UK winter of 2014-15: another Tabloid FAIL
I just reviewed the data on the SkS Temperature Trend page and, though the maximum values are not identified, it is clear that none of the data sets show the most recent 3 month averages to be the warmest. And not all the data sets have the most recent 6 months as the warmest. In fact, the HADCRUT krig and HADCRUT hybrid data sets only indicate that the averages of about 30 months and longer are governed by the the time period ending in FEB 2015.
-
One Planet Only Forever at 01:35 AM on 30 March 2015The UK winter of 2014-15: another Tabloid FAIL
Tony W,
In the NASA GISTEMP data set of the Land-Ocean monthly averages the 3 month period ending in February 2015 was not the warmest 3 month average. The 3 month average ending in April 2010 was the warmest (And early 2010 was also when the warmest 2, 4, and 5 month averages occurred, none of the warmest were in 1998 - the warmest month was in Jan 2007). In that data set it is only the 6 month and longer averages ending in Feb 2015 that are the warmest (every single one of those from the 6 month average through to a 1000 month average).
However, the claim made may be correct for the NOAA Land-Ocean surface temperature data set, or the HadCRUT Land-Ocean set, or the Land only data sets. So the claim about the warmest 3 months simply needs to be provided with clarification of its context.
The most important context for the record setting recent warmth is that it is occurring with less of an El Nino bump than occurred in 2010. And the multi-month averages that occurred during the massive El Nino bump of 1997-98 are significantly cooler than the current multi-month averages of equal duration. IN the GISTEMP L-O data set the warmest 3 month average in 1998 was about 0.70 C. The 3 month averages since the 3 months ending in Oct 2014 have all been warmer. And the March 2015 average only needs to be above 0.56 C to continue that string.
Prev 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 Next
