Climate Science Glossary

Term Lookup

Enter a term in the search box to find its definition.

Settings

Use the controls in the far right panel to increase or decrease the number of terms automatically displayed (or to completely turn that feature off).

Term Lookup

Settings


All IPCC definitions taken from Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Annex I, Glossary, pp. 941-954. Cambridge University Press.

Home Arguments Software Resources Comments The Consensus Project Translations About Donate

Twitter Facebook YouTube Pinterest

RSS Posts RSS Comments Email Subscribe


Climate's changed before
It's the sun
It's not bad
There is no consensus
It's cooling
Models are unreliable
Temp record is unreliable
Animals and plants can adapt
It hasn't warmed since 1998
Antarctica is gaining ice
View All Arguments...



Username
Password
Keep me logged in
New? Register here
Forgot your password?

Latest Posts

Archives

Climate Hustle

2015 SkS Weekly News Roundup #45

Posted on 7 November 2015 by John Hartz

A chronological listing of the news articles posted on the Skeptical Science Facebook page during the past week.

Sun, Nov 1

Mon, Nov 2

Tue, Nov 3

Wed, Nov 4

Thu, Nov 5

Fri, Nov 6

Sat, Nov 7

0 0

Bookmark and Share Printable Version  |  Link to this page

Comments

Comments 1 to 3:

  1. If one cyclone hitting Yemen was "rare," what word can express how weird it is that two are hitting that war torn country within a week of each other--after nearly a hundred years without any?!

    www.aljazeera.com/news/2015/11/rare-cyclone-bears-beleaguered-yemen-megh-socotra-weather-151107221838657.html

    0 0
  2. How remarkable is the fact theat on Nov 2, TransCanada asked Obama to suspend review of Keystone XL, as opposed to pressing him to review and approve for several leading years. They wanted the review to be held in Jan 2017 when Obama’s term will be over. No comment necessary: they new the rejection was coming.

    IMO, the rejection is just symbolic if any of Rep candidates - hardcore science deniers - will succeed Obama. Then Transcanada will not hesitate to reapply for this time an assured permit. Our only hope is that Hillary wins, then after next 4 or 8 years the issue may become irrelevant when e.g. declining renewable prices render Keystone XL uneconomic & obsolete.

    0 0
  3. @chriskoz #2: In light of your comment, you will want to check out:

    Keystone pipeline rejected: Is TransCanada out of options? by Michael D. Regan, The Christian Science Monitor, Nov 8, 2015

    0 0

You need to be logged in to post a comment. Login via the left margin or if you're new, register here.



The Consensus Project Website

THE ESCALATOR

(free to republish)

Smartphone Apps

iPhone
Android
Nokia

© Copyright 2018 John Cook
Home | Links | Translations | About Us | Contact Us