Climate's changed before
	It's the sun
	It's not bad
	There is no consensus
	It's cooling
	Models are unreliable
	Temp record is unreliable
	Animals and plants can adapt
	It hasn't warmed since 1998
	Antarctica is gaining ice
	View All Arguments...

Latest Posts

• Cool climate papers 2011
• Still Going Down the Up Escalator
• Check With Climate Scientists for Views on Climate
• Measurements show Earth heating up, think tanks & newspapers disagree
• Climate change policy: Oil's tipping point has passed
• New research from last week 4/2012
• The Latest Denialist Plea for Climate Change Inaction
• 2012 SkS Weekly Digest #4
• David Archibald Exaggerates the Solar Influence on Future Climate Change
• Bilal Bomani, Cutting Edge Biofuels from NASA
• Katharine Hayhoe, Intent to Intimidate
• Public talk: Global Warming - The Full Picture
• New temperature record for the Arctic in 2011
• NASA scientists expect more rapid global warming in the very near future (part 1)
• Patrick Michaels Continues to Distort Hansen 1988, Part 2
• New research from last week 3/2012
• Patrick Michaels Continues to Distort Hansen 1988, Part 1
• Debunking Handbook: update and feedback
• The National Center for Science Education defends climate science in high schools
• 2012 SkS Weekly Digest #3
• National (US) Strategy Proposed to Respond to Climate Change’s Impacts on Fish, Wildlife, Plants
• 2011 Hottest La Niña Year on Record, 11th-Hottest Overall
• How do Climate Models Work?
• A Comprehensive Review of the Causes of Global Warming
• Arctic methane outgassing on the E Siberian Shelf part 2 - an interview with Dr Natalia Shakhova
• Lessons from the Whitehouse-Annan Wager
• New research from last week 2/2012
• Patrick Michaels: Serial Deleter of Inconvenient Data
• 2012 SkS Weekly Digest #2
• Puget Sound, Under Threat From Ocean Acidification, Put on "Waters of Concern" List

Archives

Comments Policy

The main purpose of the discussion threads is that we all develop a greater understanding of the science. To that end, the following rules must be followed when posting comments:

• No accusations of deception. Any accusations of deception, fraud, dishonesty or corruption will be deleted. This applies to both sides. Stick to the science. You may criticise a person's methods but not their motives.
• No ad hominem attacks. Attacking other users or anyone holding a different opinion to you is common in debates but gets us no closer to understanding the science. For example, comments containing the words 'religion' and 'conspiracy' tend to get deleted. Comments using labels like 'alarmist' and 'denier' are usually skating on thin ice.
• No politics. Rants about politics, religion, faith, ideology or one world governments will be deleted.
• No link or pic only. Links to useful resources are welcome (see HTML tips below). However, comments containing only a link will be deleted. At least provide a short summary of the content of the webpage to facilitate discussion (and show you understand the page you're linking to). Similarly, images are very welcome as they can be very useful in explaining the science. But comments with pictures in isolation without explanation will be deleted.
• No ALL CAPS. You can't have a civil, constructive discussion if you're shouting.
• No profanity or inflammatory tone. Again, constructive discussion is difficult when overheated rhetoric or profanity is flying around.
• No off topic comments. Stick to the subject at hand. If you have something to say about an unrelated topic, use the Search form in the left margin to find the appropriate page.
• No copying and pasting from other comments. If you wish to refer to earlier comments, you can hyperlink directly to them. To make this easier, note that with each comment, the date/time is a hyperlink. If you link to this URL, clicking on the link will take you directly to that part of the page.
• No cyber stalking. Posting personal details of another user results in your account being banned from Skeptical Science.

If we all followed these guidelines in any discussion, perhaps the world would be a calmer and more constructive place.

HTML Tips:

HTML Hyperlinks
When posting a URL, it's better to make it an active link for several reasons. Firstly because it makes it easier for readers to follow the link. Secondly, it enables you to use descriptive words for the link rather than a URL. Lastly, and most importantly, long URLs can break the Skeptical Science web design which makes me very unhappy. To post a hyperlink, use the following code:

<a href="http://url"> Description of page you're linking to</a>

<img src="http://image_url">

IMPORTANT: The image must be no wider than 450 pixels. If the image is wider than this, use the width element to resize it to 450 pixels. Eg:

<a href="Description of page you're linking to"><img width="450" src="Description of page you're linking to"></a>

Other HTML Tags:

Bold: <b>Whatever text you want bold here</b>

Italic: <i>Whatever text you want italic here</i>

Underline    <u>Whatever text you want to underline here</u>

If the above doesn't work, follow this advice

THE ESCALATOR

(free to republish)

THE DEBUNKING HANDBOOK

BOOK NOW AVAILABLE

The Scientific Guide to
Global Warming Skepticism

Smartphone Apps

iPhone

Android

Nokia