Climate Science Glossary

Term Lookup

Enter a term in the search box to find its definition.

Settings

Use the controls in the far right panel to increase or decrease the number of terms automatically displayed (or to completely turn that feature off).

Term Lookup

Settings


All IPCC definitions taken from Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Annex I, Glossary, pp. 941-954. Cambridge University Press.

Home Arguments Software Resources Comments The Consensus Project Translations About Support

Twitter Facebook YouTube Mastodon MeWe

RSS Posts RSS Comments Email Subscribe


Climate's changed before
It's the sun
It's not bad
There is no consensus
It's cooling
Models are unreliable
Temp record is unreliable
Animals and plants can adapt
It hasn't warmed since 1998
Antarctica is gaining ice
View All Arguments...



Username
Password
New? Register here
Forgot your password?

Latest Posts

Archives

The DENIAL101x temperature tool

Posted on 5 May 2015 by Kevin C

As part of DENIAL101x, we've released a new tool which enables anyone to check and debunk misinformation about the historical temperature record for themselves.

This isn't the temperature tool - use the link above to open it.

Try it for yourself here!

You can look at temperature records at any scale, from a local weather station to national and global records. You can investigate common myths, such as the impact of urban heat islands and adjustments to the data. And you can use simple statistical tests to examine the accuracy of the record for yourself.

Here's an introductory video on using the temperature tool:

There's more information in the course materials, for example explaining those two 'advanced' method buttons at the bottom of the tool. Turn those off and you can produce nonsense - but very interesting nonsense. Why? To find out more, it's not too late to sign up at DENIAL101x.

3 0

Printable Version  |  Link to this page

Comments

Comments 1 to 9:

  1. This is an awesome tool!  Thanks so much, Kevin!

    0 0
  2. Wow!  And thankyou.

    0 0
  3. The only thing that I would wish for relative to this would be to see a pre-industrial baseline and a way to show the 2C limit.

    0 0
  4. Can it clarify what the anomaly is on the vertical axis? (i.e., 'difference to 1900-1980 avg' or whatever is actually is?)

    0 0
  5. Difference vs 61-90 average (like HadCRUT4).


    I though I'd been so careful to eliminate the jargon term 'Anomaly' from all my graph axes, but there it is again!

    0 0
  6. Absolutely, positively, completely blown away.  Most useful tool since the Robogrip

    0 0
  7. A very nice addition! There are a lot of talented people who contribute to this site!

    0 0
  8. @ Kevin C   why do you say " to eliminate the jargon term 'Anomaly' from all my graph axes," ?  I would have thought the 'anomaly' term is important.

    Brilliant tool.

    0 0
  9. As this is your first post, Skeptical Science respectfully reminds you to please follow our comments policy. Thank You!

     

    It looks fantastic. This is my first time logged in to the website. I am using a Samsung galaxy to play with it and do not seem to get enough resolution between the spots to identify the weather stations where I live.

    0 0

You need to be logged in to post a comment. Login via the left margin or if you're new, register here.



The Consensus Project Website

THE ESCALATOR

(free to republish)


© Copyright 2024 John Cook
Home | Translations | About Us | Privacy | Contact Us