Home Arguments Software Resources Comments Translations About

Twitter RSS Posts RSS Posts RSS Posts Email Subscribe



Climate's changed before
It's the sun
It's not bad
There is no consensus
It's cooling
Models are unreliable
Temp record is unreliable
Animals and plants can adapt
It hasn't warmed since 1998
Antarctica is gaining ice
View All Arguments...


Username
Password
Keep me logged in
New? Register here
Forgot your password?

Latest Posts

Archives


DMI data on Arctic temperatures: Hide the Increase?

The skeptic argument...

DMI show cooling Arctic
From DMI we learn, that Arctic 80N-90N temperatures in the melt season this year is colder than average. This was the case last year too, while earlier years in the DMI analysis period (1958-2010) hardly ever shows Arctic melt season temperatures this cold (Frank Lansner)

What the science says...

Select a level... Basic Intermediate Advanced
While summer maximums have showed little trend, the annual average Arctic temperature has risen sharply in recent decades.

A recent WUWT article by Frank Lansner, August 5th 2010 has the heading “DMI polar data shows cooler Arctic temperature since 1958”. Peter Berenyi also posted a similar chart here on SkS.

If we look at the Danish Meteorological Institute (DMI) Arctic temperature records, we see that every year the Arctic Surface temperatures rise to a maximum of just above 0 degrees C in summer, before falling again to extremely cold temperatures in the long dark winters.  As each summer advances, the ice surface temperature rises, until the melting point of ice is reached. At this point any further thermal energy is used to melt the ice, and the surface temperature (and the air just above it) can not increase while any significant amount of ice remains.  At present there are still significant amounts of sea ice above 80 degrees North through the Summer melt season.

It is well documented that annual average Arctic air temperatures have increased over the past few decades, at a rate around twice the global average. How are these temperature records reconciled with the DMI summer data?

If we look at the entire official daily DMI data set, we can quickly see that the Summer temperatures do not vary much over the entire record (much as in the Lansner chart), but the Winter temperatures have significantly increased, visible even on this zoomed out vertical scale which includes the large seasonal variations.


Figure 1: DMI daily temperature values, annual average and linear trend over the entire record period

Fitting a simple linear trend to the data, we see that the DMI trend over the recorded period is positive at 0.37 degrees C/decade, roughly twice the reported global average (from surface measurement data sets and satellite data), entirely in keeping with other reported Arctic temperature data from multiple sources (such as Bekryaev 2010, which gives 0.364 degrees C/decade over a similar 1958 to 2008 period).

If we look at the DMI 12 month anomaly trend (pink, offset for clarity) compared with the reported “fall” in “Melt season” temperatures (green), we see the Lansner chart in context. This chart is therefore highly misleading.


Figure 2: DMI summer melt season temperatures and annual DMI temperature anomaly as well as five year running averages

Last updated on 31 October 2010 by Peter Hogarth.

Printable Version  |  Link to this page

Comments

Comments 1 to 4:

  1. It is also worth nothing that the DMI acknowledges the reality of rapid warming on their website about the Arctic:

    "Since the 1970s the extent of sea ice has been measured from satellites. From these measurements we know that the sea ice extent today is significantly smaller than 30 years ago. During the past 10 years the melting of sea ice has accelerated, and especially during the ice extent minimum in September large changes are observed. The sea ice in the northern hemisphere have never been thinner and more vulnerable."
  2. What a chewy article. Thanks, Peter!
  3. HumanityRules at 01:18 AM on 18 October, 2010
    In the advance article the trends in Fig5 are tenfold less than Fig6. Should that be per year?
  4. Peter Hogarth at 08:05 AM on 18 October, 2010
    HumanityRules at 01:18 AM on 18 October, 2010

    Thanks, I have corrected this now.

Post a Comment

Political, off-topic or ad hominem comments will be deleted. Comments Policy...

You need to be logged in to post a comment. Login via the left margin or if you're new, register here.

Link to this page


THE ESCALATOR

(free to republish)

THE DEBUNKING HANDBOOK

BOOK NOW AVAILABLE

The Scientific Guide to
Global Warming Skepticism

Smartphone Apps

iPhone
Android
Nokia

© Copyright 2012 John Cook
Home | Links | Translations | About Us | Contact Us